Secretin-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-pancreatography in Pancreatic Insufficient and Pancreatic Sufficient Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although indirect methods of assessment of the exocrine pancreatic function have become the standard of care in the monitoring of pancreatic status, it still remains a current clinical challenge. Our aim was to compare the width of the pancreatic duct in pancreatic insufficient (PI) and pancreatic sufficient (PS) cystic fibrosis (CF) patients using secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SE-MRCP). METHODS: Thirty-seven CF patients were enrolled for this cross-sectional study, including 21 PI and 16 PS, all of whom underwent SE-MRCP. Measurement of the diameter of the pancreatic duct was performed in the head, body, and the tail of the pancreas at the baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after secretin administration. RESULTS: The diameter of the pancreatic duct in the head of the pancreas after 5 and 10 minutes of secretin injection was greater in PI than in PS patients (median = 2.0 mm [interquartile range: 1.6-3.0] vs. 2.0 mm [1.0-2.0] and 2.0 mm [1.4-2.0] vs 1.0 mm [1.0-2.0], p=0.047 and p=0.040, respectively). Areas under ROC curves for discriminating between PI and PS patients were 0.693 (95% CI 0.521-0.866) and 0.698 (95% CI 0.528-0.868), respectively. No other differences in the width of the duct were identified at the baseline or during SE-MRCP. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of the diameter of the pancreatic duct during secretin stimulation does not allow for differentiating between PS and PI status in CF patients.

Smaller Width of the Pancreatic Duct During Secretin-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Pancreatic-Sufficient Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: New tools are needed in cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnostics in pancreatic-sufficient CF (PS-CF) patients. Secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SE-MRCP) allows for improved assessment of the width of the pancreatic duct. METHODS: Sixteen PS-CF patients and 17 healthy volunteers underwent SE-MRCP. The width of the pancreatic duct in the head, the body, and the tail of the pancreas was measured at the baseline and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after secretin administration. RESULTS: The width of the pancreatic duct in the head of the pancreas did not differ between the groups at the baseline; after 10 minutes of secretin stimulation, it was smaller in PS-CF patients (median, 1.4 mm [first-third quartile, 1.3-2.0] vs 2.2 mm [1.7-2.4], P = 0.008). The area under the curve for discrimination between the 2 groups using this parameter was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The SE-MRCP identified differences in the width of the pancreatic duct between PS-CF and healthy volunteers. Further improvements of the method are needed to augment its clinical utility.